UPR Sexual Rights Database

Search & Filters

Select one or more parameters to begin your search. You may also search by keyword at any time.

UN Member State that is reviewed on its human rights record as part of the UPR process.

Categories of the types of information used during reviews

Show advanced filters
Source of Reference

Recommending State

UN Member State or Permanent Observer making sexual rights related recommendations, comments or asking questions to the State under Review.

Review Documentation

Sources of information used as the basis for a State’s review.  Includes the State’s National Report, UN Compilation Report and a Stakeholder Summary.

UN Regional Group to which State under Review belongs.

UN Regional Group to which Recommending State belongs.

This will only match recommendations where the Source of Review is a State.

Implementation notes

State responses to recommendations and issues raised in the UN Compilation and Stakeholder summary.

Displaying 40676 - 40700 of 58126 recommendations found
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Stakeholder Summary

    Issue:
    • Sexuality education
    • HIV and AIDS
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Neglected
    Contents:
    JS4 and JS6 reported that the content of the sex education in schools was very problematic and often did not conform to scientific standards, which had consequences for young people in terms of their vulnerability for STIs including HIV/AIDS, as well as unintended pregnancies. [Para 43]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Estonia

    Estonia
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • International human rights instruments
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Unclear Response
    Contents:
    Ratify the OP-CRPD.
    Explanation
    At this time, the Government cannot present its final position concerning this recommendation; the justifiability of signing and ratifying the Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities will be subject to a future review.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Czechia

    Czechia
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • Rights of same-sex desiring persons
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Rejected
    Contents:
    Strengthen the protection of individuals against discrimination, including based on sexual orientation or gender identity ...
    Explanation
    Not accepted. Poland has no immediate plans to introduce new regulations on partnerships
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Pakistan

    Pakistan
    Regional group
    Asia-Pacific Group
    Political group
    OIC
    Commonwealth
    Issue:
    • Gender equality
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Continue its efforts to promote gender equality by focusing on the implementation of the National Action Programme for Equal Treatment.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Botswana

    Botswana
    Regional group
    Africa Group
    Political group
    AU
    Commonwealth
    Issue:
    • Violence against women / gender-based violence
    • Sexual violence
    • Women's participation
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Adopt measures to protect women’s rights, including by strengthening of laws against sexual violence and ensuring the equal participation of women in political and public affairs.
    Explanation
    Accepted; under implementation.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    UN Compilation

    Issue:
    • HIV and AIDS
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Neglected
    Contents:
    The CRC remained concerned that children with HIV/AIDS tended to be segregated in preschool and compulsory education. [Para 66]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Mexico

    Mexico
    Regional group
    GRULAC
    Political group
    OAS
    OEI
    ACS
    Issue:
    • Women's and / or girls' rights
    • Gender equality
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Establish a national plan or programme that favour the full enjoyment of all the human rights by the women.
    Implementation
    National Report:
    Para 56) The National Action Programme for Equal Treatment for 2013–2016 is an important instrument of the Government’s policy of equal treatment (among others, on grounds of gender). The Programme defines the goals and priorities of actions for equal treatment in the following areas: raising awareness of the general public on equal treatment, including reasons and consequences of breaches of the principle of equal treatment; preventing breaches of the principle of equal treatment; collaboration with social partners, NGOs and others to promote equal treatment.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    United Kingdom

    United Kingdom
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    Commonwealth
    Issue:
    • Discrimination based on sexual orientation
    • Discrimination based on gender identity
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Rejected
    Contents:
    Extend its hate crime and hate speech legislation, to ensure equal treatment and broad protection for all from discrimination, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
    Explanation
    Poland understands the term “gender” as exclusively biological sex, therefore a natural sex of a person, that is of a woman or a man. Poland does not recognise the term “gender identity”. … Poland has appropriate legal mechanisms that protect all persons against discrimination, hate speech, hate crime, prejudice on the grounds of sexual orientation etc. Therefore, there is no need to categorise individuals, awarding them protection specifically provided for by law of downright individual character.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Switzerland

    Switzerland
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    OIF
    Issue:
    • Abortion
    • Sexual and / or reproductive rights and / or health broadly
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Rejected
    Contents:
    Ensure effective access to timely and non-discriminatory sexual and reproductive health care and services, decriminalize abortion in all cases, and ensure that women and girls have access to safe and legal abortion in accordance with the CEDAW.
    Explanation
    The conditions for the permissibility of termination of pregnancy in Poland are defined by the provisions of the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Permissibility of Termination of Pregnancy. In accordance with Article 4a(1) of the aforesaid Act, termination of pregnancy may only be effected by a physician in a case when: (1) the pregnancy endangers the life or health of the pregnant woman; (2) there is a reasonable suspicion that the pregnancy originates from an act capable of constituting a criminal offence. The circumstances referred to in subsection 1 are certified by a physician other than the one performing the abortion, except where the pregnancy presents a direct threat to the pregnant woman’s life, and the circumstance referred to in subsection 2 is certified by a public prosecutor. The circumstances referred to in subsection 1 are certified by a physician other than the one performing the abortion, except where the pregnancy presents a direct threat to the pregnant woman’s life, and the circumstance referred to in subsection 2 is certified by a public prosecutor. The Act also requires the woman’s written consent to an abortion. In the case of a minor or completely legally incapacitated woman, the legal guardian’s consent is required. In the case of a minor above 13 years of age, her written consent is also required. In the case of a minor below 13 years of age, the guardianship court’s consent is required, and the minor has a right to make her opinion known. In the case of a completely legally incapacitated woman, her written consent is also required, except where the condition of her health does not so permit. In the absence of the legal guardian’s consent, termination of pregnancy requires the consent of the guardianship court. Moreover, the provisions of the Act specify the time-limit in which the procedure may be carried out. Where there is a reasonable suspicion that the pregnancy originates from an act capable of constituting a criminal offence, termination of pregnancy is permissible if no more than 12 weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the pregnancy. The Regulation of the Minister of Health and Social Care of 22 January 1997 concerning the professional qualifications of physicians authorized to perform abortions and to determine that the pregnancy endangers the woman’s life or health or suggests a high probability of severe irreversible impairment of the foetus or life-threatening incurable illness specifies that an abortion may be performed by a physician holding a first-degree specialization in obstetrics and gynaecology or the title of a specialist in obstetrics and gynaecology. The existence of circumstances suggesting that the pregnancy endangers the pregnant woman’s life or health is certified by a physician holding the title of a specialist in the medical discipline proper to the type of the illness suffered by the pregnant woman. As for access to benefits in the discussed area, Article 4b of the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Lawful Termination of Pregnancy provides that, ‘persons covered by social insurance and persons eligible for free health-care under separate provisions shall be eligible for free pregnancy termination in health-care establishments.’ The list of guaranteed benefits in relation to abortion is specified by Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 22 November 2013 concerning guaranteed benefits in the area of hospital care. Furthermore, it ought to be noted that in the light of the applicable provisions, including chiefly the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 8 September 2015 concerning the general terms of contracts for health-care services (Journal of Laws of 2016, item 1146), all health-care establishments (hospitals) having contracted with the National Health Fund (NFZ) have a duty to provide the benefits specified therein in the full scope and in compliance with the applicable law. By signing a contract for health-care services, the provider agrees to provide all services specified as guaranteed benefits in the relevant executive regulations under the Act, to the extent of the relevant scope and type of benefits covered by the contract. As noted above, the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 22 November 2013 concerning guaranteed benefits in the area of hospital care includes abortion. The effective legal remedy for, among others, women denied the right to carry out the abortion procedure (in circumstances prescribed by the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Lawful Termination of Pregnancy) is the patient’s right to object to the physician’s opinion or decision. The aforesaid right was introduced to the Polish legal system by the provisions of the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. The right accrues to the patient and can also be exercised on the patient’s behalf by the statutory guardian. In accordance with the aforementioned Act, the objection against a physician’s or dentist’s opinion or decision may be lodged with the Medical Board operating under the auspices of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, if the opinion or decision affects the patient’s rights or obligations arising from the provisions of the law. The activities of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman’s Medical Board are governed by the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 10 March 2010 concerning the Medical Board operating under the auspices of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. Pursuant to Article 32(2) of the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, the national consultants, in consultation with the relevant voivodeship consultants, shall once a year by 30 March compile lists of physicians eligible to serve as members of the Medical Board. The Patient’s Rights Ombudsman has reached out to the national consultants in the relevant medical disciplines concerning updates to the lists prepared and submitted by them. It should furthermore be noted that the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, in addition to the right to object, has also created a central organ of government administration — significant from the perspective of the protection of the rights of all patients, including without limitation pregnant women experiencing difficulties with access to abortion — in the form of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. ... In regard to providing access to termination of pregnancy as in the case of Recommendation 118. As for the amendment of Article 152(2) of the Criminal Code, there are no plans to initiate legislative work in this respect. Therefore, there are no grounds to support the Recommendation to repeal or amend this provision in the near future. ... The conditions for the permissibility of termination of pregnancy in Poland are defined by the provisions of the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Permissibility of Termination of Pregnancy. In accordance with Article 4a(1) of the aforesaid Act, termination of pregnancy may only be effected by a physician in a case when: (1) the pregnancy endangers the life or health of the pregnant woman; (2) there is a reasonable suspicion that the pregnancy originates from an act capable of constituting a criminal offence. The circumstances referred to in subsection 1 are certified by a physician other than the one performing the abortion, except where the pregnancy presents a direct threat to the pregnant woman’s life, and the circumstance referred to in subsection 2 is certified by a public prosecutor. The circumstances referred to in subsection 1 are certified by a physician other than the one performing the abortion, except where the pregnancy presents a direct threat to the pregnant woman’s life, and the circumstance referred to in subsection 2 is certified by a public prosecutor. The Act also requires the woman’s written consent to an abortion. In the case of a minor or completely legally incapacitated woman, the legal guardian’s consent is required. In the case of a minor above 13 years of age, her written consent is also required. In the case of a minor below 13 years of age, the guardianship court’s consent is required, and the minor has a right to make her opinion known. In the case of a completely legally incapacitated woman, her written consent is also required, except where the condition of her health does not so permit. In the absence of the legal guardian’s consent, termination of pregnancy requires the consent of the guardianship court. Moreover, the provisions of the Act specify the time-limit in which the procedure may be carried out. Where there is a reasonable suspicion that the pregnancy originates from an act capable of constituting a criminal offence, termination of pregnancy is permissible if no more than 12 weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the pregnancy. The Regulation of the Minister of Health and Social Care of 22 January 1997 concerning the professional qualifications of physicians authorized to perform abortions and to determine that the pregnancy endangers the woman’s life or health or suggests a high probability of severe irreversible impairment of the foetus or life-threatening incurable illness specifies that an abortion may be performed by a physician holding a first-degree specialization in obstetrics and gynaecology or the title of a specialist in obstetrics and gynaecology. The existence of circumstances suggesting that the pregnancy endangers the pregnant woman’s life or health is certified by a physician holding the title of a specialist in the medical discipline proper to the type of the illness suffered by the pregnant woman. As for access to benefits in the discussed area, Article 4b of the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Lawful Termination of Pregnancy provides that, ‘persons covered by social insurance and persons eligible for free health-care under separate provisions shall be eligible for free pregnancy termination in health-care establishments.’ The list of guaranteed benefits in relation to abortion is specified by Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 22 November 2013 concerning guaranteed benefits in the area of hospital care. ... Procreative health constitutes an important element of the definition of health as complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity relating to the reproductive system and procreation in all phases of life. Among other things, procreative health includes topics relating to pubescence and menopause, fertility and infertility, family planning, as well as health during pregnancy, delivery and confinement. Attention to procreative health is key to the well-being of Poles and the good health of the generations to come, and it assists actions taken with a view to improving the demographic ratios. Everybody has a right to the protection of health in Poland; regardless of the citizens’ respective economic situations, public authorities guarantee equal access to publicly financed health-care services the scope of which is defined by a separate statute. Women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement enjoy special legal protection in Poland. Protection of women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement is guaranteed both by domestic legislation and international treaties ratified by Poland.Procreative health constitutes an important element of the definition of health as complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity relating to the reproductive system and procreation in all phases of life. Among other things, procreative health includes topics relating to pubescence and menopause, fertility and infertility, family planning, as well as health during pregnancy, delivery and confinement. Attention to procreative health is key to the well-being of Poles and the good health of the generations to come, and it assists actions taken with a view to improving the demographic ratios. Everybody has a right to the protection of health in Poland; regardless of the citizens’ respective economic situations, public authorities guarantee equal access to publicly financed health-care services the scope of which is defined by a separate statute. Women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement enjoy special legal protection in Poland. Protection of women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement is guaranteed both by domestic legislation and international treaties ratified by Poland.Procreative health constitutes an important element of the definition of health as complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity relating to the reproductive system and procreation in all phases of life. Among other things, procreative health includes topics relating to pubescence and menopause, fertility and infertility, family planning, as well as health during pregnancy, delivery and confinement. Attention to procreative health is key to the well-being of Poles and the good health of the generations to come, and it assists actions taken with a view to improving the demographic ratios. Everybody has a right to the protection of health in Poland; regardless of the citizens’ respective economic situations, public authorities guarantee equal access to publicly financed health-care services the scope of which is defined by a separate statute. Women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement enjoy special legal protection in Poland. Protection of women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement is guaranteed both by domestic legislation and international treaties ratified by Poland. Furthermore, it ought to be noted that in the light of the applicable provisions, including chiefly the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 8 September 2015 concerning the general terms of contracts for health-care services (Journal of Laws of 2016, item 1146), all health-care establishments (hospitals) having contracted with the National Health Fund (NFZ) have a duty to provide the benefits specified therein in the full scope and in compliance with the applicable law. By signing a contract for health-care services, the provider agrees to provide all services specified as guaranteed benefits in the relevant executive regulations under the Act, to the extent of the relevant scope and type of benefits covered by the contract. As noted above, the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 22 November 2013 concerning guaranteed benefits in the area of hospital care includes abortion. The effective legal remedy for, among others, women denied the right to carry out the abortion procedure (in circumstances prescribed by the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus and Conditions for the Lawful Termination of Pregnancy) is the patient’s right to object to the physician’s opinion or decision. The aforesaid right was introduced to the Polish legal system by the provisions of the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. The right accrues to the patient and can also be exercised on the patient’s behalf by the statutory guardian. In accordance with the aforementioned Act, the objection against a physician’s or dentist’s opinion or decision may be lodged with the Medical Board operating under the auspices of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, if the opinion or decision affects the patient’s rights or obligations arising from the provisions of the law. The activities of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman’s Medical Board are governed by the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 10 March 2010 concerning the Medical Board operating under the auspices of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. Pursuant to Article 32(2) of the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, the national consultants, in consultation with the relevant voivodeship consultants, shall once a year by 30 March compile lists of physicians eligible to serve as members of the Medical Board. The Patient’s Rights Ombudsman has reached out to the national consultants in the relevant medical disciplines concerning updates to the lists prepared and submitted by them. It should furthermore be noted that the Act of 6 November 2008 on the Patient’s Rights and on the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, in addition to the right to object, has also created a central organ of government administration — significant from the perspective of the protection of the rights of all patients, including without limitation pregnant women experiencing difficulties with access to abortion — in the form of the Patient’s Rights Ombudsman. ... Procreative health constitutes an important element of the definition of health as complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity relating to the reproductive system and procreation in all phases of life. Among other things, procreative health includes topics relating to pubescence and menopause, fertility and infertility, family planning, as well as health during pregnancy, delivery and confinement. Attention to procreative health is key to the well-being of Poles and the good health of the generations to come, and it assists actions taken with a view to improving the demographic ratios. Everybody has a right to the protection of health in Poland; regardless of the citizens’ respective economic situations, public authorities guarantee equal access to publicly financed health-care services the scope of which is defined by a separate statute. Women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement enjoy special legal protection in Poland. Protection of women in pregnancy, delivery and confinement is guaranteed both by domestic legislation and international treaties ratified by Poland. ... As for health-care benefits in the area of procreative and sexual health, the rationale is analogous to the one for Recommendations 118 and 122. … With 27 January 2021, due to the coming into force of the decision of the Constitutional Court in K 1/20, of 22 October 2020, Article 4a(1)(2) of the Act ceased to be valid; this was the provision for the permissibility of pregnancy termination in cases in which prenatal examinations or other medical indications suggested a high probability of severe irreversible impairment of the foetus or its incurable life-threatening disease. …It must accordingly be emphasized that the change of the law in this regard has occurred not as a result of any legislative efforts but due to a finding of unconstitutionality made by the competent organ. Moreover, as a marginal note, attention must be paid to the matter of the state’s autonomy in the area of domestic legislation concerning the permissibility of abortion.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Uruguay

    Uruguay
    Regional group
    GRULAC
    Political group
    OAS
    OEI
    Issue:
    • International human rights instruments
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Consider inviting the Independent Expert on the protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity to visit the country, in order to have timely technical advice to strengthen national policies and counter disinformation.
    Explanation
    No declaration as to the date of the visit.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Australia

    Australia
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    PIF
    Commonwealth
    Issue:
    • Discrimination based on sexual orientation
    • Discrimination based on gender identity
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Unclear Response
    Contents:
    Introduce legislation against hate crimes and expand existing education programmes to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity and race to protect members of marginalised communities.
    Explanation
    Noted. According to the Article 32 of the Polish Constitution all persons shall be equal before the law. All persons shall have the right to equal treatment by public authorities. No one shall be discriminated against in political, social or economic life for any reason whatsoever. Polish legislation provides far-reaching protection against discrimination. Anti-discrimination legislation already covers sexual orientation, and labour law prohibits discrimination on any grounds whatsoever (including without limitation identification with a different sex than stated in identity papers). According to the Polish Constitution under the term ‘gender’ Poland understands only one’s biological sex, which is understood to mean either a woman or a man. For this reason, any interpretation of guarantees relating to so-called ‘gender identity’ cannot be understood as readiness to introduce legislative amendments in the scope in which ‘gender’ goes beyond the term referred to a woman or man identified on the basis of their biological characteristics.

  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Philippines

    Philippines
    Regional group
    Asia-Pacific Group
    Political group
    ASEAN
    Issue:
    • Violence on the basis of sexual orientation
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Unclear Response
    Contents:
    Step up efforts to combat intolerance, violence and discrimination against migrants, ethnic and sexual minorities.
    Explanation
    Noted.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Moldova

    Moldova
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    CIS
    OIF
    Issue:
    • Women's participation
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Promote and support women political participation and women candidates at senior level in Government and state institutions, and secure an enabling workplace environment for women.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Spain

    Spain
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    OEI
    Issue:
    • Abortion
    Type:
    Question
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    N/A
    Contents:
    What measures is the Polish government going to take to ensure that health workers are able to practice safe abortions (in cases when the life of the mother is in danger) without any legal consequences?
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Austria

    Austria
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • International human rights instruments
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Unclear Response
    Contents:
    Sign and ratify the OP-CRPD.
    Explanation
    At this point in time, the Polish Government cannot make a definitive
    statement on this recommendation; Poland will examine the Optional Protocol to the CRPD with a view to possible signature and ratification in due course;
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Brazil

    Brazil
    Regional group
    GRULAC
    Political group
    OAS
    OEI
    Issue:
    • Discrimination based on sexual orientation
    • Discrimination based on gender identity
    • Rights of same-sex desiring persons
    • Transgender persons' rights
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    The adoption of policies that safeguard the rights of LGBT people and fight discrimination based on sexual orientation.
    Explanation
    In the course of implementation.
    Implementation
    National Report:
    Para 85) The prohibition of discrimination in political, social and economic life on all grounds is part of the Polish legal system enshrined in Article 32 (2) of the Constitution. The Polish legal system, considered holistically, safeguards broad protection of the principle of equal treatment on many levels.

    Para 86) Protection against discrimination should be considered in the first place in the context of protection of personal rights safeguarded by civil law. In the current legal status quo, this matter is governed by Article 23 of the Civil Code. It defines personal rights by providing an open-ended list of designations including reputation, freedom of conscience, name and image.

    Para 87) The aforementioned provisions imply that protection of personal rights is comprehensive as it may be exercised in many ways using diverse remedies. It may be financial or non-financial in nature.

    Para 88) Further to the foregoing, it should be noted that the applicable legislation offers comprehensive protection of any person whose personal rights have been violated or put at risk. This includes two types of non-financial claims: to cease and desist, and to take measures necessary to eliminate the violation of personal rights. Furthermore, it provides that financial protection as compensation may be adjudicated in favour of the victim or a charity in each case of violation of (or risk to) personal rights, as well as damages where a financial loss is incurred due to the violation of personal rights.

    Para 89) According to Article 11.3 of the LC, any discrimination in employment, including on grounds of sexual orientation, either direct or indirect, is prohibited. Employees have equal rights for equal performance of the same obligations (recommendation 70). The provisions of the LC concerning compensation for a violation of the principle of equal treatment in employment apply in the event of damage caused by discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation. The Act of 3 December 2010 implementing certain EU legislation on equal treatment prohibits discrimination (among other things on grounds of sexual orientation) against individuals who work under civil law contracts.

    Para 90) Protection against discrimination is safeguarded by the Act on Promotion of Employment and Labour Market Institutions. The Act on Promotion of Employment and Labour Market Institutions provides for criminal liability in the event of violation of the principle of equal treatment. Certain EU legislation on equal treatment applies in proceedings involving violation of the principle of equal treatment.

    Para 91) The National Labour Inspectorate takes three types of actions to enforce the legislation on equal treatment in employment: prevention, advisory, and monitoring of employers accused of discriminatory practice. Criminal law and labour law, as well as a range of specific statutes, include safeguards of the prohibition of discrimination.

    Stakeholder Summary:
    Para 6) Joint Submission 5 (JS5), Polish Council of Youth Organizations (PROM) and AI expressed concern about the significant reduction of the budget for the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner (Office of the Commissioner). PROM indicated that the budget cut posed a serious risk of a number of adverse consequences and was against recommendations 90.32, 90.34 and 90.35. JS5 and Joint Submission 6 (JS6) highlighted that the main argument for cutting its budget was the fact that it carried out anti-discrimination tasks, including gender equality and LGBT rights, and that the Commissioner for Human Rights had regularly been attacked by right-wing parties, including the ruling party.

    Para 11) AI, Fundacia Trans-Fuzia (TF), JS5, and the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance of the Council of Europe (CoE-ECRI) expressed concern that LGBTI persons and persons with disabilities had not been awarded greater protection in Poland’s anti-discrimination law

    Para 12) JS5 indicated that the Equal Treatment Act lacked holistic approach to the issue of discrimination and did not treat all marginalised groups equally. This resulted in hierarchy of protection, where the least protected grounds were sexual orientation, age, disability and religion. Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation had been implemented only in relation to the Labour Code, and to a limited extent, to the Equal Treatment Act. However, provisions included in the Act covered only the area of employment, excluding other areas, such as health care, education and access to goods and services. The Polish authorities still had not implemented any provisions prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity.

    Para 13) AI stated that the Criminal Code specifically provided for the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes motivated by race, ethnicity, nationality, religion and political affiliation. However, it did not establish that age, disability, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, and social or economic status were grounds to investigate and prosecute hate crimes

    Para 18) Concerning the collection of data on and monitoring of hate crime and hate speech, JS4 stated that the system was fairly capable of capturing recorded incidents motivated by racism and xenophobia (bias motivations included in the Criminal Code), however, when it came to biases which were not mentioned in the Criminal Code, primarily sexual orientation, gender identity and disability, the numbers captured were still negligible

    Para 21) Concerning recommendation 90.67 on guaranteeing the full enjoyment of the rights of the LGBT community, TF indicated that its implementation was a subject of debate, although it had been said to be “in the course of implementation”.

    Para 22) JS4 noted that Poland had not implemented recommendations 90.66, 90.68 and 90.94 on hate crimes against LGBT persons

    Para 23) On recommendations 90.68 and 90.71, JS6 stated that LGBTI persons did not receive the full protection of the State for their enjoyment of freedom of association. A refusal to officially acknowledge attacks against them left LGBTI persons and other minority groups without adequate protection. AI noted that, in February and March 2016, the offices of two major LGBTI organizations in Warsaw, Campaign against Homophobia and Lambda, were attacked.

    Para 24) As for recommendation 90.70, TF stressed that transgender persons had still not been included in the anti-discrimination law. For recommendation 90.71, TF welcomed the introduction of partial funding of hormone in 2015 by the Ministry of Health. However, TF regretted a 2016 draft policy on diplomas and certificates of higher education, which required transgender people, who had received legal gender recognition, to return the original diploma and all of its official copies, in order to have a new diploma and certificate issued.

    Para 25) Concerning recommendation 90.94, TF noted an elevated interest of law enforcement in training on transgender issues between 2011 and 2014, however, according to TF, such an interest decreased significantly in late 2015 and throughout 2016.

    Para 61) In reference to recommendations 90.69, 90.71, and 90.97, KPH indicated that the adoption of legislation enabling same-sex couples entering into civil union was still necessary. According to KPH, lack of recognition of same sex-couples led to discrimination of both same-sex couples and of trans persons in marriages, who needed to divorce in order to receive legal gender recognition. EU-FRA raised similar concern. According to JS5, Polish citizens who intended to get a civil partnership or marriage with a same-sex partner were often refused the civil status certificates, due to the fact that the Constitution defined marriage as a relationship of a men and a woman.

    Para 62) TF stated that a number of trans persons were delaying their legal gender recognition and medical transition in fear of losing parental rights, as the rights of transitioning parents had not been safeguarded by the State. Furthermore, according to TF, there were no existing alternatives to trans persons and their spouses, who wished to remain in a relationship, as Poland did not recognize neither same sex marriage, nor civil partnerships of any kind, hence couples were effectively forced to divorce as part of legal gender recognition.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Norway

    Norway
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Issue:
    • Abortion
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Ensure, as a minimum, that women can access lawful abortion by creating clear, legally binding regulations for the implementation of the 1993 Family Planning Act.
    Implementation
    National Report:
    Para 65) The conditions for abortion are defined in the Act of 7 January 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of the Human Foetus, and Conditions of Admissibility of Abortion (recommendations 106, 107, 108, 109). The Act governs issues concerning a woman’s consent for abortion, and the period of pregnancy when abortion is lawful. Moreover, according to the Act, individuals covered by social security and individuals entitled to free-of-charge medical care are eligible to use free-of-charge abortion in the healthcare sector.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    UN Compilation

    Issue:
    • Women's and / or girls' rights
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Not Followed up with a Recommendation
    Contents:
    UNESCO ... recommended that Poland share with UNESCO any relevant information to update its country profile on the UNESCO Observatory on the Right to Education and on Her Atlas, the UNESCO interactive tool for monitoring the right to education for girls and women. [Para 34]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Stakeholder Summary

    Issue:
    • Sexuality education
    • Abortion
    • Sexual and / or reproductive rights and / or health broadly
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    41st session, November 2022
    Status:
    Reference Addressed
    Contents:
    AI recommended to ensure legal, timely and effective access to both safe abortion and contraception to all people who need it, in line with international human rights law and standards. It recommended decriminalizing all aspects of abortion and refraining from criminalizing the provision of other sexual and reproductive health services and information, and identifying and removing any access barriers. It also recommended to refrain from criminalizing comprehensive sexuality education and ensure its provision to all children and adolescents both in and outside of school, in line with international law and standards. [Para 36]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    UN Compilation

    Issue:
    • International human rights instruments
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Reference Addressed
    Contents:
    ... CESCR urged Poland to ensure that the provisions of ICESCR are made justiciable and that effective remedies are available to victims of violations of economic, social and cultural rights. [Para 3]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Stakeholder Summary

    Issue:
    • Sexual exploitation / slavery
    Type:
    Review Documentation
    Session:
    13th session, June 2012
    Status:
    Neglected
    Contents:
    ... It recommended that Poland eradicate sexual exploitation and prosecute and impose appropriate sanctions on any perpetrator of the alleged violations. [Para 21]
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Italy

    Italy
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • International human rights instruments
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Unclear Response
    Contents:
    Sign and ratify the OP-ICESCR.
    Explanation
    At this time, the Polish Government (the Government) cannot present its final position concerning this recommendation; the justifiability of signing and ratifying the Protocol to the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights will be subject to a future review.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Belgium

    Belgium
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    OIF
    Issue:
    • Discrimination based on sexual orientation
    • Discrimination based on gender identity
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Amend the Criminal Code to provide that crimes motivated by discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity are investigated and prosecuted as hate crimes.
    Explanation
    Accepted; under implementation. Relevant measures already carried out by the Police, the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, and the Government Plenipotentiary for Equal Treatment.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Netherlands

    Netherlands
    Regional group
    WEOG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • Abortion
    • Sexual and / or reproductive rights and / or health broadly
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Implement fully and effectively the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of RR v. Poland and P&S v. Poland on the issue of women and girls’ access to sexual and reproductive health-care and services.
    Explanation
    Accepted and implemented. The patient’s right to file an objection to a medical doctor’s opinion or certificate is the principal measure introduced to the Polish legal system with a view to implementing the judgements.
  • State Under Review:

    Poland

    Poland
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Source Of Reference:

    Croatia

    Croatia
    Regional group
    EEG
    Political group
    EU
    Issue:
    • Violence against women / gender-based violence
    • Domestic violence
    Type:
    Recommendation
    Session:
    27th Session May 2017
    Status:
    Accepted
    Contents:
    Organize a national campaign to raise awareness on the specific needs of women victims of domestic violence and gender-based violence.
    Explanation
    Accepted and implemented.